Which place is cheaper, San Francisco or Aqaba?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Aqaba or San Francisco, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Aqaba is a port city in Jordan, in fact, it is the only port city in the country. This city is located on the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea, which is in the southern part of Jordan. The city is still being developed; many of its facilities and infrastructures are being improved. The population of Aqaba is about 190,000 and the city has been key in developing Jordan's economy via trade and tourism.
San Francisco is a beautiful city that is famous for it's picturesque neighborhoods, liberal character, and stunning location on the bay. Some people describe San Francisco as the United State's most "European City." This title most likely comes from its compact development and its easy walkability. It also has no shortage of parks and public spaces where you can pass some time. The city sits on the end of a peninsula and offers stunning views of the blue bay, rolling green hills, and the striking Golden Gate Bridge.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Jordan, The Best Budget Tours to Jordan, The Best 2-Week Tours from Los Angeles, and The Best Family-Friendly Tours to United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Aqaba is $157, while the average daily cost in San Francisco is $251. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Aqaba and San Francisco in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Aqaba or San Francisco? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Aqaba:
Here are some examples of typical transportation prices from actual travelers in San Francisco:
Also for San Francisco, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both San Francisco and Aqaba change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Aqaba.
For San Francisco, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Here are a few actual costs in Aqaba for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for San Francisco.
For more ideas for your next trip, check out The Best Museums in San Francisco, The Best Outdoor Activities in San Francisco, and Things to Do In San Francisco on a Rainy Day.
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in San Francisco:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Aqaba and San Francisco, we can see that San Francisco is more expensive. And not only is Aqaba much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Aqaba is in Middle East and San Francisco is in North America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Aqaba would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Aqaba and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in San Francisco would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in San Francisco than you might in Aqaba.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Aqaba Expensive? and Is San Francisco Expensive?.
San Francisco has a larger population, and is about 8 times larger than the population of Aqaba. When comparing the sizes of Aqaba and San Francisco, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
San Francisco has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Aqaba experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
Both San Francisco and Aqaba during the summer are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Aqaba because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Also, the beaches, the hiking, the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to San Francisco this time of year.
The heat can be very extreme in Aqaba. In the summer, Aqaba is much warmer than San Francisco. Typically, the summer temperatures in Aqaba in July average around 33°C (91°F), and San Francisco averages at about 63°F (17°C).
Aqaba usually gets less rain in July than San Francisco. Aqaba gets 0 mm (0 in) of rain, while San Francisco receives 0.1 inches (2 mm) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Aqaba and San Francisco. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Aqaba year-round. Also, many travelers come to San Francisco for the hiking trails, the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, the music scene, and the natural beauty of the area.
In October, Aqaba is generally a little warmer than San Francisco. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 26°C (79°F), and San Francisco fluctuates around 63°F (17°C).
In October, Aqaba usually receives less rain than San Francisco. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while San Francisco receives 1.3 inches (33 mm) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Aqaba as well as San Francisco. Aqaba attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, many visitors come to San Francisco in the winter for the museums, the shopping scene, the theater shows, and the cuisine.
Aqaba is a little warmer than San Francisco in the winter. The daily temperature in Aqaba averages around 14°C (57°F) in January, and San Francisco fluctuates around 50°F (10°C).
Aqaba usually gets less rain in January than San Francisco. Aqaba gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while San Francisco receives 3.8 inches (96 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both San Francisco and Aqaba are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Aqaba throughout the year. Also, most visitors come to San Francisco for the beaches, the activities around the city, and the natural beauty during these months.
In the spring, Aqaba is much warmer than San Francisco. Typically, the spring temperatures in Aqaba in April average around 24°C (75°F), and San Francisco averages at about 58°F (14°C).
In April, Aqaba usually receives less rain than San Francisco. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while San Francisco receives 1.2 inches (31 mm) of rain each month for the spring.
Aqaba | San Francisco | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 14°C (57°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 50°F (10°C) | 3.8 inches (96 mm) |
Feb | 16°C (61°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 54°F (12°C) | 2.7 inches (69 mm) |
Mar | 19°C (66°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 56°F (13°C) | 2.7 inches (69 mm) |
Apr | 24°C (75°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 58°F (14°C) | 1.2 inches (31 mm) |
May | 27°C (81°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 60°F (15°C) | 0.2 inches (5 mm) |
Jun | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 62°F (17°C) | 0.1 inches (3 mm) |
Jul | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 63°F (17°C) | 0.1 inches (2 mm) |
Aug | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 64°F (18°C) | 0.1 inches (1 mm) |
Sep | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 66°F (19°C) | 0.3 inches (7 mm) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 63°F (17°C) | 1.3 inches (33 mm) |
Nov | 20°C (68°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 57°F (14°C) | 2.8 inches (71 mm) |
Dec | 15°C (59°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 51°F (11°C) | 2.7 inches (68 mm) |