Which place is cheaper, Utrecht or Aqaba?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Aqaba or Utrecht, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Aqaba is a port city in Jordan, in fact, it is the only port city in the country. This city is located on the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea, which is in the southern part of Jordan. The city is still being developed; many of its facilities and infrastructures are being improved. The population of Aqaba is about 190,000 and the city has been key in developing Jordan's economy via trade and tourism.
Utrecht is both a province and a city in the Netherlands. The city is a unique university city with a lively atmosphere. Imagine Amsterdam but smaller, and with fewer tourists. Utrecht has the same underlying historical/magical feel as Amsterdam, but is full of locals rather than crowds of tourists. It has a population of about 300,000 making it the fourth largest city in the Netherlands.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Jordan, The Best Budget Tours to Jordan, The Best Family-Friendly Tours to Netherlands, and The Best One Week (7-Day) Tours in Netherlands.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Aqaba is $157, while the average daily cost in Utrecht is $271. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Aqaba and Utrecht in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Aqaba or Utrecht? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Aqaba:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Utrecht:
Prices for flights to both Utrecht and Aqaba change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Aqaba.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Utrecht.
Here are a few actual costs in Aqaba for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Utrecht are as follows:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Aqaba and Utrecht, we can see that Utrecht is more expensive. And not only is Aqaba much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Aqaba is in Middle East and Utrecht is in Europe, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Aqaba would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Aqaba and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Utrecht would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Utrecht than you might in Aqaba.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Aqaba Expensive? and Is Utrecht Expensive?.
Utrecht has a larger population, and is about 3 times larger than the population of Aqaba. When comparing the sizes of Aqaba and Utrecht, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Utrecht has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Aqaba experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Aqaba and Utrecht. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Aqaba year-round. Also, most visitors come to Utrecht for the family-friendly experiences during these months.
Aqaba can become quite hot in the summer. In July, Aqaba is generally much warmer than Utrecht. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 33°C (91°F), and Utrecht fluctuates around 17°C (62°F).
In Aqaba, it's very sunny this time of the year. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Utrecht during summer. Aqaba gets 384 hours of sunny skies, while Utrecht receives 194 hours of full sun in the summer.
In July, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 0 mm (0 in) of rain, while Utrecht receives 75 mm (3 in) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Aqaba as well as Utrecht. Aqaba attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, the autumn months attract visitors to Utrecht because of the shopping scene and the natural beauty of the area.
Aqaba is much warmer than Utrecht in the autumn. The daily temperature in Aqaba averages around 26°C (79°F) in October, and Utrecht fluctuates around 11°C (51°F).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Aqaba this time of the year. In the autumn, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 295 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Utrecht receives 100 hours of full sun.
Aqaba usually gets less rain in October than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Utrecht receives 72 mm (2.8 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Utrecht and Aqaba are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Aqaba throughout the year. Also, the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine are the main draw to Utrecht this time of year.
It's quite cold in Utrecht in the winter. In the winter, Aqaba is much warmer than Utrecht. Typically, the winter temperatures in Aqaba in January average around 14°C (57°F), and Utrecht averages at about 2°C (36°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Aqaba. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Utrecht during winter. Aqaba gets 234 hours of sunny skies, while Utrecht receives 38 hours of full sun in the winter.
In January, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Utrecht receives 66 mm (2.6 in) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Utrecht and Aqaba during the spring are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Aqaba because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Furthermore, many travelers come to Utrecht for the natural beauty.
In April, Aqaba is generally much warmer than Utrecht. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 24°C (75°F), and Utrecht fluctuates around 8°C (46°F).
It's quite sunny in Aqaba. In the spring, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 282 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Utrecht receives 156 hours of full sun.
Aqaba usually gets less rain in April than Utrecht. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Utrecht receives 52 mm (2 in) of rain this time of the year.
Aqaba | Utrecht | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 14°C (57°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 2°C (36°F) | 66 mm (2.6 in) |
Feb | 16°C (61°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 3°C (37°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) |
Mar | 19°C (66°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 63 mm (2.5 in) |
Apr | 24°C (75°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 8°C (46°F) | 52 mm (2 in) |
May | 27°C (81°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 12°C (54°F) | 61 mm (2.4 in) |
Jun | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 15°C (59°F) | 68 mm (2.7 in) |
Jul | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 17°C (62°F) | 75 mm (3 in) |
Aug | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 17°C (62°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) |
Sep | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 14°C (57°F) | 67 mm (2.6 in) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 11°C (51°F) | 72 mm (2.8 in) |
Nov | 20°C (68°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 6°C (43°F) | 81 mm (3.2 in) |
Dec | 15°C (59°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 3°C (38°F) | 80 mm (3.1 in) |