Which place is cheaper, Olympic National Park or Berkshires?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
Trying to figure out where to travel next? This travel comparison between Berkshires and Olympic National Park can help. It includes a travel cost comparison in addition to other factors. For many travelers, the cost of a destination is a primary consideration when choosing where to go.
The Berkshires are a popular highland destination in the western part of Massachusetts and northwest Connecticut. The region has scenic landscape, hiking, lakes, recreational opportunities and other outdoor experiences. The Berkshires also has an impressive cultural scene with music, arts, museums, and live theaters.
The Berkshires can be a bit expensive to visit if you stay at a luxury resort and take advantage of the award winning restaurants in the area. Alternatively, the experience can be equally rewarding by camping, picnicking, and spending your time hiking and enjoying the beautiful natural setting.
Olympic National Park is in Washington State and was originally established as a national monument in 1909. The area is known for its large Sitka spice and Douglas fir trees, which can be found in the Hoh and Queets rainforest valleys on the western side of the park. The area's temperate rainforest climate creates lush thick moss and dense vegetation that gives the setting a fairytale quality.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Coach Bus Tours in United States of America, The Best Adventure Tours to United States of America, The Best Train & Rail Tours in United States of America, and The Best Sightseeing Tours in United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Berkshires is $297, while the average daily cost in Olympic National Park is $150. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Berkshires and Olympic National Park in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Berkshires or Olympic National Park? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Prices for flights to both Olympic National Park and Berkshires change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Olympic National Park are as follows:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Berkshires and Olympic National Park, we can see that Berkshires is more expensive. And not only is Olympic National Park much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Olympic National Park would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Olympic National Park and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Berkshires would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Berkshires than you might in Olympic National Park.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Berkshires Expensive? and Is Olympic National Park Expensive?.
Both destinations experience a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. And since both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Berkshires and Olympic National Park. Also, many visitors come to Olympic National Park in the summer for the hiking and the family-friendly experiences.
Berkshires is a little warmer than Olympic National Park in the summer. The daily temperature in Berkshires averages around 72°F (22°C) in July, and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 60°F (15°C).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Olympic National Park this time of the year. In Berkshires, it's very sunny this time of the year. Berkshires usually receives more sunshine than Olympic National Park during summer. Berkshires gets 289 hours of sunny skies, while Olympic National Park receives 210 hours of full sun in the summer.
In July, Berkshires usually receives around the same amount of rain as Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 2.7 inches (69 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 2.8 inches (70 mm) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Berkshires as well as Olympic National Park. Also, most visitors come to Olympic National Park for the hiking trails, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area during these months.
In the autumn, Berkshires is around the same temperature as Olympic National Park. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Berkshires in October average around 51°F (11°C), and Olympic National Park averages at about 51°F (10°C).
In the autumn, Berkshires often gets more sunshine than Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 162 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Olympic National Park receives 113 hours of full sun.
It's quite rainy in Olympic National Park. Berkshires usually gets less rain in October than Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 2.6 inches (67 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 10.4 inches (263 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both Olympic National Park and Berkshires are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. Also, the winter months attract visitors to Olympic National Park because of the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.
The weather in Olympic National Park can be very cold. Berkshires can be very cold during winter. In January, Berkshires is generally much colder than Olympic National Park. Daily temperatures in Berkshires average around 22°F (-6°C), and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 41°F (5°C).
Berkshires usually receives more sunshine than Olympic National Park during winter. Berkshires gets 138 hours of sunny skies, while Olympic National Park receives 56 hours of full sun in the winter.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Olympic National Park. In January, Berkshires usually receives less rain than Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 1.9 inches (49 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 13.7 inches (349 mm) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Olympic National Park and Berkshires during the spring are popular places to visit. Furthermore, the natural beauty are the main draw to Olympic National Park this time of year.
Berkshires is around the same temperature as Olympic National Park in the spring. The daily temperature in Berkshires averages around 47°F (9°C) in April, and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 47°F (8°C).
It's quite sunny in Berkshires. In the spring, Berkshires often gets more sunshine than Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 223 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Olympic National Park receives 148 hours of full sun.
Olympic National Park gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Berkshires usually gets less rain in April than Olympic National Park. Berkshires gets 2.6 inches (66 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 7.4 inches (189 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Berkshires | Olympic National Park | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 22°F (-6°C) | 1.9 inches (49 mm) | 41°F (5°C) | 13.7 inches (349 mm) |
Feb | 24°F (-4°C) | 2 inches (51 mm) | 43°F (6°C) | 12.2 inches (311 mm) |
Mar | 35°F (2°C) | 2.5 inches (63 mm) | 44°F (7°C) | 11.6 inches (294 mm) |
Apr | 47°F (9°C) | 2.6 inches (66 mm) | 47°F (8°C) | 7.4 inches (189 mm) |
May | 59°F (15°C) | 3 inches (75 mm) | 52°F (11°C) | 5.6 inches (142 mm) |
Jun | 67°F (20°C) | 3.3 inches (83 mm) | 56°F (13°C) | 3.3 inches (85 mm) |
Jul | 72°F (22°C) | 2.7 inches (69 mm) | 60°F (15°C) | 2.8 inches (70 mm) |
Aug | 70°F (21°C) | 3 inches (76 mm) | 60°F (16°C) | 2.4 inches (60 mm) |
Sep | 62°F (17°C) | 2.8 inches (71 mm) | 58°F (14°C) | 5 inches (126 mm) |
Oct | 51°F (11°C) | 2.6 inches (67 mm) | 51°F (10°C) | 10.4 inches (263 mm) |
Nov | 41°F (5°C) | 2.9 inches (73 mm) | 45°F (7°C) | 14 inches (355 mm) |
Dec | 28°F (-2°C) | 2.7 inches (69 mm) | 41°F (5°C) | 15 inches (380 mm) |