A Travel Price Comparison for United States of America Kansas City vs. Olympic National Park for Vacations, Tours, and Honeymoons

Should you visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park?

Which is cheaper to visit? Which is more expensive for vacation?

Should I visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.

Where Should I go: Kansas City or Olympic National Park?

Kansas City

A large, mid western city that sits on the border between Missouri and Kansa, Kansas City has a population of about 450,000. It's not exactly a tourist destination, but it is a surprisingly beautiful city with more boulevards than Paris and more fountains than any other city in the world with the exception of Rome. Most of the city's suburbs are concentrated in the south but the city is beginning to grow to the north as well. The climate in Kansas City can vary dramatically, in large part because it is so far from any form of water. Winters can range from mild to extremely cold and snow is not uncommon. Spring and fall and quite comfortable but summer months can be incredibly hot and humid.

Olympic National Park

Olympic National Park is in Washington State and was originally established as a national monument in 1909. The area is known for its large Sitka spice and Douglas fir trees, which can be found in the Hoh and Queets rainforest valleys on the western side of the park. The area's temperate rainforest climate creates lush thick moss and dense vegetation that gives the setting a fairytale quality.

For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Camping Tours in United States of America, The Best Romantic Tours for Couples in United States of America, The Best Polar Tours & Cruises in United States of America, and The Best Walking Tours in United States of America.

When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Kansas City and Olympic National Park, we can see that Kansas City is more expensive. And not only is Olympic National Park much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Olympic National Park would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Olympic National Park and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Kansas City would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Kansas City than you might in Olympic National Park.

If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Kansas City Expensive? and Is Olympic National Park Expensive?.

When is the best time to visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park?

Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.

Should I visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park in the Summer?

The summer brings many poeple to Kansas City as well as Olympic National Park. Additionally, the hiking and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to Olympic National Park this time of year.

In July, Kansas City is generally much warmer than Olympic National Park. Daily temperatures in Kansas City average around 82°F (28°C), and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 60°F (15°C).

The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Olympic National Park. People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Kansas City this time of the year. In the summer, Kansas City often gets more sunshine than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 325 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Olympic National Park receives 210 hours of full sun.

Kansas City usually gets more rain in July than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 3.3 inches (83 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 2.8 inches (70 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Should I visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park in the Autumn?

Both Olympic National Park and Kansas City are popular destinations to visit in the autumn with plenty of activities. Also, many travelers come to Olympic National Park for the hiking trails, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area.

Kansas City is a little warmer than Olympic National Park in the autumn. The daily temperature in Kansas City averages around 60°F (15°C) in October, and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 51°F (10°C).

The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Kansas City. Kansas City usually receives more sunshine than Olympic National Park during autumn. Kansas City gets 208 hours of sunny skies, while Olympic National Park receives 113 hours of full sun in the autumn.

It rains a lot this time of the year in Olympic National Park. In October, Kansas City usually receives less rain than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 2.4 inches (62 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 10.4 inches (263 mm) of rain each month for the autumn.

Should I visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park in the Winter?

Both Olympic National Park and Kansas City during the winter are popular places to visit. Also, many visitors come to Olympic National Park in the winter for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.

Olympic National Park can get quite cold in the winter. Be prepared for some very cold days in Kansas City. In the winter, Kansas City is much colder than Olympic National Park. Typically, the winter temperatures in Kansas City in January average around 30°F (-1°C), and Olympic National Park averages at about 41°F (5°C).

In the winter, Kansas City often gets more sunshine than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 175 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Olympic National Park receives 56 hours of full sun.

Olympic National Park gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Kansas City usually gets less rain in January than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 0.9 inches (23 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 13.7 inches (349 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Should I visit Kansas City or Olympic National Park in the Spring?

The spring attracts plenty of travelers to both Kansas City and Olympic National Park. Also, most visitors come to Olympic National Park for the natural beauty during these months.

In April, Kansas City is generally much warmer than Olympic National Park. Daily temperatures in Kansas City average around 58°F (15°C), and Olympic National Park fluctuates around 47°F (8°C).

In Kansas City, it's very sunny this time of the year. Kansas City usually receives more sunshine than Olympic National Park during spring. Kansas City gets 231 hours of sunny skies, while Olympic National Park receives 148 hours of full sun in the spring.

Olympic National Park receives a lot of rain in the spring. In April, Kansas City usually receives less rain than Olympic National Park. Kansas City gets 2.8 inches (71 mm) of rain, while Olympic National Park receives 7.4 inches (189 mm) of rain each month for the spring.

Typical Weather for Olympic National Park and Kansas City