Which place is cheaper, Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park or Saint John?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
Which city should you visit? Read on to compare the activities as well as the prices of travel for Saint John and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. We'll break down costs for accommodation, food, transportation and more to help you learn more about these two destinations. Then, you can figure out if either of these two places are accessible based on your travel budget, schedule, and interests. So, let's dig into it.
With the popularity of the Caribbean rising, many islands have become touristy and expensive – but not St. John in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
At only nine miles long and five miles wide, St. John is the smallest of the Virgin Islands, and, many argue, the prettiest. It's the kind of place that has maintained it's cultural identity, but still welcomes visitors from all over the world. With a population of just 5,000, the residents of St. John know everyone and everything happening on the island.
This island is perfect for people who want an undisturbed island getaway at any price. Between resorts and campgrounds there is a spot for everyone on St. John.
Located in northeastern California, Lassen Volcanic National Park is one of those places you don't hear too much about, yet it is a one-of-a-kind park boasting all 4 volcano types, hydrothermal areas, and over 150 miles of trails. Lassen Peak is the most popular attraction, a cinder cone volcano, which is open for visitors who wish to hike to the top. From here you can see sweeping views of the surrounding valley, clear mountain lakes, flower spotted meadows, and even other volcanoes in the Cascade Range like Mount Shasta.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Walking Tours in United States of America, and The Best Northern Lights Tours in Alaska.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Saint John is $233, while the average daily cost in Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park is $148. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Saint John and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Saint John or Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Prices for flights to both Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park and Saint John change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Here are a few actual costs in Saint John for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Saint John and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park, we can see that Saint John is more expensive. And not only is Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Saint John is in Caribbean Islands and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park is in North America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Saint John would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Saint John than you might in Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Saint John Expensive? and Is Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park Expensive?.
Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Saint John experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Saint John and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Saint John year-round. Also, the summer months attract visitors to Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park because of the hiking and the family-friendly experiences.
Saint John is around the same temperature as Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park in the summer. The daily temperature in Saint John averages around 29°C (83°F) in July, and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park fluctuates around 83°F (29°C).
In July, Saint John usually receives more rain than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Saint John gets 66 mm (2.6 in) of rain, while Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park receives 0.1 inches (2 mm) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Saint John as well as Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Saint John attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, the hiking trails, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area are the main draw to Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park this time of year.
In the autumn, Saint John is a little warmer than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Saint John in October average around 28°C (82°F), and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park averages at about 66°F (19°C).
Saint John receives a lot of rain in the autumn. Saint John usually gets more rain in October than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Saint John gets 146 mm (5.7 in) of rain, while Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park receives 1.5 inches (37 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park and Saint John are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Saint John throughout the year. Also, many travelers come to Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.
In January, Saint John is generally much warmer than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Daily temperatures in Saint John average around 26°C (78°F), and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park fluctuates around 47°F (9°C).
It rains a lot this time of the year in Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. In January, Saint John usually receives less rain than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Saint John gets 43 mm (1.7 in) of rain, while Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park receives 4.1 inches (104 mm) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park and Saint John during the spring are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Saint John because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Furthermore, many visitors come to Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park in the spring for the natural beauty.
Saint John is much warmer than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park in the spring. The daily temperature in Saint John averages around 27°C (80°F) in April, and Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park fluctuates around 60°F (16°C).
Saint John usually gets more rain in April than Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park. Saint John gets 72 mm (2.8 in) of rain, while Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park receives 1.4 inches (35 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Saint John | Mt. Lassen Volcanic National Park | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 26°C (78°F) | 43 mm (1.7 in) | 47°F (9°C) | 4.1 inches (104 mm) |
Feb | 26°C (78°F) | 39 mm (1.5 in) | 52°F (11°C) | 3.4 inches (86 mm) |
Mar | 26°C (79°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 55°F (13°C) | 3.1 inches (78 mm) |
Apr | 27°C (80°F) | 72 mm (2.8 in) | 60°F (16°C) | 1.4 inches (35 mm) |
May | 28°C (82°F) | 94 mm (3.7 in) | 69°F (21°C) | 0.8 inches (20 mm) |
Jun | 28°C (83°F) | 64 mm (2.5 in) | 78°F (25°C) | 0.4 inches (11 mm) |
Jul | 29°C (83°F) | 66 mm (2.6 in) | 83°F (29°C) | 0.1 inches (2 mm) |
Aug | 29°C (84°F) | 101 mm (4 in) | 81°F (27°C) | 0.2 inches (6 mm) |
Sep | 28°C (83°F) | 127 mm (5 in) | 76°F (25°C) | 0.6 inches (16 mm) |
Oct | 28°C (82°F) | 146 mm (5.7 in) | 66°F (19°C) | 1.5 inches (37 mm) |
Nov | 27°C (81°F) | 126 mm (4.9 in) | 54°F (12°C) | 3.6 inches (91 mm) |
Dec | 26°C (80°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) | 47°F (9°C) | 3.4 inches (88 mm) |