Which place is cheaper, Kyoto or Turku?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Turku or Kyoto, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Turku, a city on the southwest coast of Finland, straddles the Aura River. Dating from the 13th century, it's known for Turku Castle, a medieval fortress with a history museum, perched at the river mouth. Restaurants line the cobbled riverside streets. On the eastern bank lies the Old Great Square, a former trade hub, surrounded by grand buildings. The nearby Turku Cathedral houses a royal tomb and a museum. The historic castle and cathedral point to the city's rich cultural history when it was the Finnish capital, and contemporary Turku is full of experimental art and vibrant festivals, thanks in part to its spirited university population (the country's second largest), who make Turku's nightlife young and fun. As the first city many visitors encounter arriving by ferry from Sweden and Aland, it's a splendid introduction to the Finnish mainland.
Kyoto is a larger city of Japan, though it is very much set in the old ways. With quiet temples, sublime gardens, colorful shrines, and geisha walking amidst a city surrounded by stunning mountains, Kyoto feels like a world of another time and place. True to ancient Japanese tradition, most aspects of daily life are tied closely with the changing of the seasons.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Finland, The Best Budget Tours to Finland, The Best 10-Day Tours from Tokyo, and The Best 2-Week Tours from Tokyo.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Turku is €159, while the average daily cost in Kyoto is €100. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Turku and Kyoto in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Turku or Kyoto? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Also for Turku, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Kyoto:
Prices for flights to both Kyoto and Turku change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Kyoto.
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Turku.
Here are a few actual costs in Kyoto for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Also in Kyoto, these are the prices for nightlife and alcohol related activities from various tour providers:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Turku and Kyoto, we can see that Turku is more expensive. And not only is Kyoto much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Turku is in Europe and Kyoto is in Asia, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Kyoto would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Kyoto and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Turku would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Turku than you might in Kyoto.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Turku Expensive? and Is Kyoto Expensive?.
Kyoto has a larger population, and is about 8 times larger than the population of Turku. When comparing the sizes of Turku and Kyoto, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
The summer brings many poeple to Turku as well as Kyoto. Additionally, many travelers come to Kyoto for the city activities and the family-friendly experiences.
Turku is much colder than Kyoto in the summer. The daily temperature in Turku averages around 16°C (61°F) in July, and Kyoto fluctuates around 27°C (81°F).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Turku this time of the year. In the summer, Turku often gets more sunshine than Kyoto. Turku gets 262 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Kyoto receives 183 hours of full sun.
It's quite rainy in Kyoto. Turku usually gets less rain in July than Kyoto. Turku gets 74 mm (2.9 in) of rain, while Kyoto receives 236 mm (9.3 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Kyoto and Turku are popular destinations to visit in the autumn with plenty of activities. Also, many visitors come to Kyoto in the autumn for the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area.
In the autumn, Turku is much colder than Kyoto. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Turku in October average around 6°C (43°F), and Kyoto averages at about 18°C (64°F).
Turku usually receives less sunshine than Kyoto during autumn. Turku gets 90 hours of sunny skies, while Kyoto receives 159 hours of full sun in the autumn.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Kyoto. In October, Turku usually receives less rain than Kyoto. Turku gets 69 mm (2.7 in) of rain, while Kyoto receives 111 mm (4.4 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
Both Kyoto and Turku during the winter are popular places to visit. Also, most visitors come to Kyoto for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine during these months.
Kyoto can be very cold during winter. Turku can get quite cold in the winter. In January, Turku is generally much colder than Kyoto. Daily temperatures in Turku average around -6°C (20°F), and Kyoto fluctuates around 5°C (40°F).
In the winter, Turku often gets less sunshine than Kyoto. Turku gets 39 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Kyoto receives 140 hours of full sun.
Turku usually gets less rain in January than Kyoto. Turku gets 46 mm (1.8 in) of rain, while Kyoto receives 50 mm (2 in) of rain this time of the year.
The spring attracts plenty of travelers to both Turku and Kyoto. Also, the spring months attract visitors to Kyoto because of the activities around the city and the natural beauty.
Turku can be very cold during spring. Turku is much colder than Kyoto in the spring. The daily temperature in Turku averages around 3°C (37°F) in April, and Kyoto fluctuates around 14°C (58°F).
Turku usually receives around the same amount of sunshine as Kyoto during spring. Turku gets 182 hours of sunny skies, while Kyoto receives 176 hours of full sun in the spring.
Kyoto receives a lot of rain in the spring. In April, Turku usually receives less rain than Kyoto. Turku gets 38 mm (1.5 in) of rain, while Kyoto receives 153 mm (6 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Turku | Kyoto | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | -6°C (20°F) | 46 mm (1.8 in) | 5°C (40°F) | 50 mm (2 in) |
Feb | -7°C (20°F) | 31 mm (1.2 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 63 mm (2.5 in) |
Mar | -3°C (27°F) | 33 mm (1.3 in) | 8°C (47°F) | 110 mm (4.3 in) |
Apr | 3°C (37°F) | 38 mm (1.5 in) | 14°C (58°F) | 153 mm (6 in) |
May | 9°C (49°F) | 33 mm (1.3 in) | 19°C (67°F) | 154 mm (6 in) |
Jun | 14°C (58°F) | 38 mm (1.5 in) | 23°C (73°F) | 251 mm (9.9 in) |
Jul | 16°C (61°F) | 74 mm (2.9 in) | 27°C (81°F) | 236 mm (9.3 in) |
Aug | 15°C (59°F) | 83 mm (3.2 in) | 29°C (83°F) | 146 mm (5.7 in) |
Sep | 10°C (51°F) | 65 mm (2.6 in) | 24°C (75°F) | 196 mm (7.7 in) |
Oct | 6°C (43°F) | 69 mm (2.7 in) | 18°C (64°F) | 111 mm (4.4 in) |
Nov | 1°C (33°F) | 67 mm (2.6 in) | 12°C (54°F) | 68 mm (2.7 in) |
Dec | -4°C (25°F) | 57 mm (2.3 in) | 7°C (45°F) | 40 mm (1.6 in) |