Which place is cheaper, Denali National Park or Woodstock?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
Should I visit Woodstock or Denali National Park? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.
While this town does lend its name to the 1969 Woodstock Festival, the legendary event was actually held on a dairy farm almost 60 miles away in Bethel, NY. So if you are looking to see the field where it all happened and a museum dedicated to its history, you will need to take a day trip outside of town.
Woodstock, New York, however, does stay true to the spirit of the arts. Since 1903, the place lay home to Byrdcliffe Art Colony, the oldest of its kind in the nation, and even attracted artists of the Hudson River School during the late 1800s. Today, artists from all disciplines-visual, ceramic, music, fiction, nonfiction, screenwriting, playwriting, and poetry-take up residence at the colony and have works displayed in galleries open in the main part of town.
Tinker Street and Mill Hill Road are lined with a mix of restaurants and shops all teeming with the essence of hippie living, arts, and spirituality. From shops selling Woodstock paraphernalia, incense, and Himalayan products, to yoga studios, vegan restaurants, and local art galleries-the town of Woodstock is one dedicated to keeping the spirit of the Woodstock Festival and the arts alive.
There is a place in Alaska, 240 miles wide, where you can be a part of the wild frontier. The expansive and untouched area of Denali National Park welcomes thousands of visitors ever year with stunning natural wonders and incredible wildlife like grizzly bears, wolves, moose, caribou and more.
As home to North America's tallest peak, Denali has attracted nature adventurers from all over the world. Established in 1917 as wildlife refuge, Denali National Park contains areas of tundra and taiga. Taiga zones are covered in evergreen, spruce and aspen trees, while tundra zones are full of miniaturized versions of the plants including flowers, mosses and shrubs.
Remember that the weather changes without warning in Denali. It is a well known to the locals that you can expect sun, wind, rain and clouds in the same day. Pack accordingly.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Hiking & Trekking Tours in United States of America, The Best Historical Tours in United States of America, The Best 10-Day Tours in United States of America, and The Best One Week (7-Day) Tours in United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Woodstock is $178, while the average daily cost in Denali National Park is $260. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Woodstock and Denali National Park in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Woodstock or Denali National Park? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Prices for flights to both Denali National Park and Woodstock change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Denali National Park.
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Woodstock and Denali National Park, we can see that Denali National Park is more expensive. And not only is Woodstock much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Woodstock would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Woodstock and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Denali National Park would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Denali National Park than you might in Woodstock.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Woodstock Expensive? and Is Denali National Park Expensive?.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
The summer brings many poeple to Woodstock as well as Denali National Park. Additionally, many travelers come to Denali National Park for the hiking and the family-friendly experiences.
In the summer, Woodstock is much warmer than Denali National Park. Typically, the summer temperatures in Woodstock in July average around 74°F (24°C), and Denali National Park averages at about 60°F (15°C).
Woodstock usually gets around the same amount of rain in July as Denali National Park. Woodstock gets 3.4 inches (87 mm) of rain, while Denali National Park receives 3.6 inches (92 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both Denali National Park and Woodstock are popular destinations to visit in the autumn with plenty of activities. Also, many visitors come to Denali National Park in the autumn for the hiking trails, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area.
Denali National Park can get quite cold in the autumn. In October, Woodstock is generally much warmer than Denali National Park. Daily temperatures in Woodstock average around 53°F (12°C), and Denali National Park fluctuates around 32°F (0°C).
In October, Woodstock usually receives around the same amount of rain as Denali National Park. Woodstock gets 3 inches (77 mm) of rain, while Denali National Park receives 3.1 inches (79 mm) of rain each month for the autumn.
Both Denali National Park and Woodstock during the winter are popular places to visit. Also, most visitors come to Denali National Park for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine during these months.
Denali National Park can be very cold during winter. Woodstock can get quite cold in the winter. Woodstock is much warmer than Denali National Park in the winter. The daily temperature in Woodstock averages around 25°F (-4°C) in January, and Denali National Park fluctuates around 11°F (-12°C).
Woodstock usually gets more rain in January than Denali National Park. Woodstock gets 3.3 inches (83 mm) of rain, while Denali National Park receives 1.3 inches (33 mm) of rain this time of the year.
The spring attracts plenty of travelers to both Woodstock and Denali National Park. Also, the spring months attract visitors to Denali National Park because of the natural beauty.
The weather in Denali National Park can be very cold. In the spring, Woodstock is much warmer than Denali National Park. Typically, the spring temperatures in Woodstock in April average around 49°F (10°C), and Denali National Park averages at about 34°F (1°C).
In April, Woodstock usually receives more rain than Denali National Park. Woodstock gets 3.7 inches (95 mm) of rain, while Denali National Park receives 1.6 inches (41 mm) of rain each month for the spring.
Woodstock | Denali National Park | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 25°F (-4°C) | 3.3 inches (83 mm) | 11°F (-12°C) | 1.3 inches (33 mm) |
Feb | 28°F (-2°C) | 3.2 inches (81 mm) | 16°F (-9°C) | 1.4 inches (37 mm) |
Mar | 38°F (3°C) | 3.8 inches (97 mm) | 23°F (-5°C) | 1.5 inches (37 mm) |
Apr | 49°F (10°C) | 3.7 inches (95 mm) | 34°F (1°C) | 1.6 inches (41 mm) |
May | 60°F (16°C) | 3.5 inches (89 mm) | 46°F (8°C) | 1.7 inches (42 mm) |
Jun | 69°F (21°C) | 3.5 inches (90 mm) | 56°F (13°C) | 2.6 inches (67 mm) |
Jul | 74°F (24°C) | 3.4 inches (87 mm) | 60°F (15°C) | 3.6 inches (92 mm) |
Aug | 72°F (22°C) | 3.9 inches (100 mm) | 56°F (14°C) | 4.5 inches (115 mm) |
Sep | 64°F (18°C) | 3.5 inches (90 mm) | 47°F (9°C) | 4.2 inches (108 mm) |
Oct | 53°F (12°C) | 3 inches (77 mm) | 32°F (0°C) | 3.1 inches (79 mm) |
Nov | 43°F (6°C) | 4.3 inches (110 mm) | 18°F (-8°C) | 1.8 inches (45 mm) |
Dec | 30°F (-1°C) | 4.1 inches (103 mm) | 13°F (-11°C) | 1.9 inches (49 mm) |